LETTER: National Park Service should be embarrassed over paltry number of fish in Elwha

It’s been three years since the Glines Canyon and Elwha dams were removed, and the NPS is touting 16 fish in an area where there should be many more.

Regarding the rock barriers at the former Glines Canyon Dam site in the Elwha River.

In a Sept. 12 Peninsula Daily News article [“ONP Finding Fish In Elwha”], it was stated that fish continue to recolonize the Elwha River watershed and that “an early August snorkel survey between Rica canyon and Glines Canyon … revealed five adult chinook, one steelhead and 10 adult sockeye salmon” were counted.

We know in the summer of 2015, most fish were blocked at the Glines Canyon Dam site, and that’s why the National Park Service blasted away 14 large rocks.

Now the NPS wants to blast four more at the Glines dam site [“More Blasting Done On Elwha River Dam Site,” PDN, Sept. 16].

Is it because of the low numbers of fish in the early August snorkel survey that have the NPS biologists worried?

Acting Park Superintendent Rachel Spector said, “We are thrilled to see this latest confirmation of the success and value of dam removal.”

Does one consider success in a count of 16 fish in one section of river where there should be many more?

This should be a $325 million embarrassment to the National Park Service for the paltry number of fish that have made it past the Glines Canyon Dam barrier.

I’m not buying into the sunshine and butterflies spin from Spector.

The NPS answer to the barrier is, “We will monitor the situation.”

Next year will be the third year since removal of the dams.

How many years do they get until they make it right?

We won’t know till next summer if the blasting was successful.

If not, maybe Congress should monitor the NPS.

Jim Anderson,

Port Angeles

More in Opinion

Carolyn Edge.
POINT OF VIEW: Mobile college campus coming to Peninsula

FOR MANY NORTH Olympic Peninsula residents, the biggest barrier to job training… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: Life on the stump ranch

THOUGH IT MAY seem like our dark and dreary winter will never… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: The 40-pound steelhead

THE HOLIDAYS ARE over. Only the mess remains. That, and the grim… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: Making and breaking New Year’s resolutions

BY NOW, I’M pretty sure we’ve all had it up to here… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: The gift of the guides

With apologies to O. Henry’s “Gift of the Magi.” EIGHTEEN DOLLARS AND… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: The Christmas colonoscopy

IT WAS DAYLIGHT on the river, but I was not on a… Continue reading

Jim Buck.
YOUR VIEW: Facts about the Elwha Watershed study

OUTSIDE SPECIAL INTERESTS are threatening to tie up more Clallam County trust… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: Interpreting the weather report

ONCE UPON A time, anthropologists somehow determined that the Eskimos have 50… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: A rainforest expedition

IT WAS A dark and stormy night. Inside the cabin, the wood… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: What Thanksgiving means to me

THANK YOU FOR reading this. Writing our nation’s only wilderness gossip column… Continue reading

Carolyn Edge.
First year of Recompete data shows projects gaining momentum

OCTOBER MARKED ONE year since the Recompete initiative started, with the goal… Continue reading

PAT NEAL: You could be spawned out

MAYBE YOU’VE HAD one of those days. You wake up in the… Continue reading