By Jason Dearen
The Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO — The governors of Washington, the other Pacific coastal states and British Columbia have vowed to collectively combat climate change by coordinating polices that place a price on greenhouse gas pollution and mandating the use of cleaner-burning fuels.
Governors of Washington, California and Oregon and the premier of British Columbia gathered in San Francisco on Monday to commit to working together to coordinate efforts with the hope of stimulating a clean-energy economy in a region with a combined gross domestic product of $2.8 trillion.
California and British Columbia already have placed a price on greenhouse gas emissions — through cap-and-trade and a carbon tax, respectively — and have also already adopted clean fuel standards.
Under terms of the agreement announced Monday, Oregon and Washington’s governors are committing their states to move forward with similar policies, even though the legislatures of both states have denied previous attempts to adopt cap-and-trade.
“California isn’t waiting for the rest of the world before it takes action on climate change,” California Gov. Jerry Brown said in a statement.
“Today, California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia are all joining together to reduce greenhouse gases.”
The deal stems from the work of the Pacific Coast Collaborative, a group meant to organize climate change and clean energy policies in a region with 53 million people.
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said he supports a statewide cap on carbon-fuel emissions, among several ideas to get the state closer to reaching goals set in 2008 to cut global warming pollution.
Still, getting bipartisan support for a cap-and-trade program in Washington state will be difficult.
Former Gov. Chris Gregoire aggressively pushed for and failed to get lawmakers in 2009 to approve a market-based carbon trading system.
Inslee is leading a bipartisan legislative work group created this year to recommend strategies to tackle climate change.
Two Republican lawmakers in that group have said they need to see what the economic impacts of those strategies would be.
Todd Myers, environmental director at the Washington Policy Center, said before the announcement Monday that he was frustrated that the regional agreement could undermine the work of that bipartisan process.
“This seems to be a symbolic gesture that undermines that process,” he said.
In Oregon, efforts to implement cap-and-trade have met a similar fate. Lawmakers there failed to pass such a measure in 2009.
Environmentalists in that state applauded Monday’s announcement as good sense.
“It’s very encouraging to see both the business community and our elected officials call for a common-sense, proactive approach to addressing climate change,” said Andrea Durbin, executive director of the Oregon Environmental Council.
California’s efforts have not come without their challenges.
The low carbon fuel standard is a key piece of California’s landmark global warming law, and is meant to cut the state’s dependence on petroleum by 20 percent and account for one-10th of the state’s goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
The state’s first-in-the-nation low-carbon fuel standard was challenged in federal court, and briefly halted by a judge, after business groups argued it violated the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution by imposing limits on interstate commerce.
A panel of federal judges allowed it to move forward in September.
