By Donna Gordon Blankinship
The Associated Press
SEATTLE — After spending years debating possible ways out of the quagmire of state education funding, lawmakers from both parties and both houses have announced they may have a plan to fix the way the state pays for education.
Some would call it a plan for a plan, since the proposal broached last week still doesn’t say how the Legislature will fix the most vexing part of the education funding problem: overreliance on local school levies to pay for basic education.
Four years after the state Supreme Court ruled that the way the state pays for education is unconstitutional, the state Legislature is still debating how to respond to the court.
Legislators are working under a contempt order and a daily $100,000 fine until they finish responding to the so-called McCleary decision.
They have added more than $2 billion to the state’s education budget — setting aside more money for all-day kindergarten, smaller classes in the younger grades, pupil transportation and classroom supplies and equipment.
Complex challenge
But they’ve left the most complex challenge for last.
The proposed bill that was supposed to address the state’s overreliance on local levies promises a solution, but not until the 2017 legislative session.
The plan, which is likely to change during debates in both houses, is short and simple:
■ It establishes a new task force to continue the work of the bipartisan group of lawmakers who have been meeting since the 2015 legislative session.
■ It demands data from the school districts on how they use their local levy money so lawmakers can figure out how much is going toward basic education.
■ It sets aside money for analysis of that data.
■ It makes a one-sentence commitment toward figuring out a way to do something about levies next year.
“It is taking more time than I would like,” acknowledged House Majority Leader Pat Sullivan, D-Covington, on Thursday.
“The fact is, there is more work that needs to be done.”
Another member of the bipartisan group that worked on the bill, Sen. Ann Rivers, R-La Center, said the bill offers a framework that lawmakers can work with this session.
“We have to stop thinking about a silver bullet approach to funding education,” she said.
“What you’re going to see is a multifaceted approach.”
Rep. Chad Magendanz, R-Issaquah, said the group has been meeting for more than a year to try to figure that out, but so far, they haven’t even agreed on how much money they need to find.
“We’ve been guessing up until now,” Magendanz said Thursday during The Associated Press Legislative Preview.
Sen. Christine Rolfes, D-Bainbridge Island, said she and other Democrats don’t even agree with the Republicans on whether they have a number in mind.
“A lot of us agree a base level is $3.5 billion,” she said.
She acknowledged, however, that it’s going to take a lot of work to convince the rest of the Legislature that the plan released Friday is going to work and that they should pass it.
“We are an absolutely split legislative body right now. What we put forward has to represent conservative values as well as liberal values,” Rolfes said.
The main thing the bill will do is keep everybody at the table, she added. That’s better than the alternative. Some lawmakers do not want to do anything, Rolfes said.
“We’ve got to be very thoughtful about how we move forward,” she said.
