By The Associated Press and Peninsula Daily News
SEATTLE — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will once again consider whether the 22-year prison sentence imposed on would-be millennium bomber Ahmed Ressam by a federal judge in Seattle was adequate.
Ressam, now 42, was arrested in Port Angeles after he arrived aboard the MV Coho ferry from Victoria in a rental car loaded with bomb-making materials on Dec. 14, 1999.
It was later revealed that Ressam was on his way to bomb Los Angeles International Airport on Jan. 1, 2000.
Last year, a divided three-judge panel of the court voted to reject the sentence imposed — for the second time — by U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, questioning his impartiality and saying that the sentence failed to protect the public from the al-Qaida-trained terrorist.
An order by Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, issued last week vacated that ruling and sent the case to be reheard by a larger panel of judges.
Coughenour presided over Ressam’s trial in the spring of 2001.
Ressam later credited the fairness of the proceedings when he decided to cooperate with federal authorities after he was convicted of attempting to bomb the Los Angeles airport.
Ressam became a crucial source of information about al-Qaida in the months after the Sept. 11 attacks, and as a result federal prosecutors initially suggested a sentence of around 35 years for crimes that could have resulted in life in prison, including a count of conspiracy to commit an act of international terrorism.
Sentencing guidelines suggested a 65-year sentence.
Prosecutors appealed when Coughenour first imposed the 22-year sentence in 2005.
Ressam has been held in solitary confinement and over years of repeated questioning had soured on his cooperation.
When the case was sent back to Coughenour for a procedural error in 2008, prosecutors urged the judge to impose the life sentence, saying Ressam had reneged on his deal.
Ressam, in the meantime, fired his lawyers and recanted everything he had ever said.
The Department of Justice told the judge that prosecutors in New York had been forced to drop charges against two other terrorism suspects — including the man believed to be al-Qaida’s chief recruiter in Western Europe — whose prosecutions turned on Ressam’s testimony.
Even so, Coughenour imposed the same sentence, saying that the information Ressam provided when he was cooperating almost certainly stopped other attacks and saved lives.
The government appealed that sentence, which resulted in last week’s order.
Last year’s 72-page ruling said Coughenour’s decision failed to protect the public.
Ressam, an Algerian who trained with al-Qaida in Afghanistan, already has completed nearly half of his sentence and will be 53 years old when he is released.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle, which handled Ressam’s prosecution, declined to comment.
Federal public defender Thomas Hillier, who has represented or advised Ressam since his first court appearance in 1999, applauded the court for granting his request to reconsider the earlier decision, which not only exposed Ressam to many more years in prison but also stripped Coughenour, the trial judge, of the case.
“We were concerned about its impact on the evolution of federal sentencing, as well as how it might impact Ahmed,” Hiller told The Seattle Times. “We’re grateful for another shot at it.”
Emily Langlie, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle, told the Times that the rehearing is “the next step in holding Mr. Ressam accountable for his crimes.”
Ressam is reportedly being held in a solitary confinement cell two stories underground at the “supermax” federal penitentiary in Florence, Colo.
